Skip to content
← All verified firms
Cloud Incident Response · database

MDSec Consulting

Partially verified

UK incident response and security consulting firm, a CIR Assured Service Provider on the NCSC's published list, whose site documents work across the full incident response lifecycle alongside adversary simulation.

Incident response services, their own page →

This page is what buyers and carriers see when they evaluate MDSec Consulting.

Buyers arrive with structured requirements and filter by certification, response time, and panel status. The more documented, the more you match.

Evidence tier ladder · your position is highlighted

3

Registry-Checked

Certifications verified against issuer registries at the named-holder level, with expiration dates checked. Buyers see exactly who holds what, confirmed by the issuer's own directory.

2

Panel-Confirmed

Carrier panel memberships documented only from carriers' own published pages, with sources and access dates. Buyers and carriers see which insurers have pre-approved you.

✓

Research-Sourced (you are here)

Documented from public research, firm website, and cited public pages. Claims are labeled as claims. This is where every firm starts — including the ones now at the top.

Your certifications, panel memberships, and response commitments are not yet on this page. Documenting them is free: no cost, no pay-for-rank, and a partial submission is fine.

Complete your documentation

Credential verification

Public-tier claims with issuer citations; registry verification pending.

How the verification model works (for buyers and carriers)

Certifications are held by individuals, never organizations. Org-level status below is a DERIVED rollup of named holders, the org claims nothing its holders do not hold. Issuer directories (GIAC, (ISC)², ISACA) list individual certificate holders with expiration dates, registry lookups resolve at the named-holder level and require no carrier data.

Your team's certifications are not yet on this page. When documented, buyers see them at the named-holder level, registry-verified with dates.

Document your certifications →

Something wrong or outdated on this listing? Request a correction with the public sources that show it.

Link your profile

Display your documented status on your own site. Buyers and carriers read a third-party source they can check as trust, and the badge carries your profile link inside it. Plain HTML, no script, no tracking, works in any CMS.

Documented on VendorQuals, evidence-graded, sources cited
<a href="https://vendorquals.com/firms/mdsec">
  <img src="https://vendorquals.com/badges/documented.svg"
       alt="Documented on VendorQuals, evidence-graded, sources cited"
       width="360" height="72" />
</a>

Panels & coverage

Insurance panels

None documented

Regions
UK

Profile

Tagline: Incident response and adversary simulation
HQ: United Kingdom
Service area: UK and international, per the firm's pages
Size: Size not documented

MDSec Consulting is a UK security firm whose site documents a certified team working with customers at all stages of the incident response lifecycle, through proactive and reactive services. Its ActiveBreach team is CBEST-certified for adversary simulation, red-teaming the tactics, techniques, and procedures of real adversaries. The firm is named on the UK NCSC's published Cyber Incident Response scheme list (MDSec Consulting Ltd, read October 2026), the NCSC's government assurance for incident response capability.

Sourced from the firm's published pages and the NCSC's published list (October 2026). No insurance panel memberships, named engagements, or response-time SLAs are documented; the platform's full verification pass is pending.

Services & engagements

Services
Incident response (full lifecycle, per the firm's pages)Adversary simulation and red team (CBEST-certified ActiveBreach team)Security consulting and advisory

Documented engagements

None found

No publicly documented case work was found on the firm's own site at the time of our research. Some firms publish engagement details under NDA restrictions; some simply do not publish. The absence of documented work is a fact, not a judgment.