CARRIER READINESS, PROTOTYPE

Coalition Cyber Panel Readiness

Active Cyber Insurance for Enterprises · US · Cyber, panel model: Panel providers.

What this is, and is not

48 providers across 57 documented relationships (recomputed after provider-name canonicalization), assembled from public carrier pages (1 source, accessed 2026-10-06). 5 of 14 readiness rules are answerable from public panel data; the rest are explicit evidence gaps, not a readiness score.

Unique providers

Documented relationships

Capability groups

100%

Core service coverage

Categories with 3+ providers

100

Panel evidence coverage

Readiness framework, 14 rules

Panel coverage

R-01 · Geographic coverageDoes the carrier have appropriate providers across target territories?

Answered by public dataHigh

Geographies observed: US

R-02 · Service coverageAre required response functions covered: counsel, DFIR, notification, PR, restoration, accounting, etc.?

Answered by public dataHigh

Core service coverage: 100% across 10 capability groups

Panel resilience

R-03 · ConcentrationIs the panel overly dependent on a small number of providers?

Answered by public dataHigh

57 relationships across 48 unique providers (concentration reviewable)

R-04 · Regional redundancyAre there at least 2 qualified alternatives for critical services in each key region?

Answered by public dataHigh

10 categories have 3+ qualified providers

Provider verification

R-05 · Evidence freshnessHow recently were credentials, insurance, certifications, contacts and capabilities verified?

Evidence gapHigh

Provider verification: 0% of providers have documented evidence, publicly absent in this dataset

R-06 · Credential statusAre required credentials/current documentation valid?

Evidence gapHigh

15% of panel providers have issuer-cited certifications (public tier); registry and contractual verification pending

Operational readiness

R-07 · 24/7 responseDoes provider advertise or contract for emergency response?

Answered by public dataMedium

24x7 provider evidence: advertised claims only, must be contract-verified

R-08 · SLADoes provider meet carrier-defined response-time requirements?

Evidence gapHigh

SLA evidence: 0% of providers have documented evidence, publicly absent in this dataset

R-09 · Surge capacityCan provider handle catastrophe/systemic-event volume?

Evidence gapHigh

Capacity evidence: 0% of providers have documented evidence, publicly absent in this dataset

Financial readiness

R-10 · Rate governanceAre negotiated rates/current pricing and scope documented?

Evidence gapHigh

Rate governance: negotiated rates and scope are contractual, not public

Regulatory readiness

R-11 · Evidence trailCan carrier demonstrate why providers were selected and remain suitable?

Requires the VendorQuals platformHigh

Requires: Verification/audit log, produced by the VendorQuals platform

R-12 · Panel adequacyCan carrier produce an evidence-backed panel adequacy report?

Requires the VendorQuals platformHigh

Requires: OTIR readiness assessment, produced by the VendorQuals platform

Change management

R-13 · Panel driftHow many relationships/providers have changed since last review?

Requires the VendorQuals platformMedium

Requires: Historical snapshots, produced by the VendorQuals platform

Remediation

R-14 · Gap closureAre identified gaps assigned, tracked and resolved?

Requires the VendorQuals platformHigh

Requires: OTIR remediation workflow, produced by the VendorQuals platform

Panel composition

Relationship category	Providers	Relationships
Breach counsel	10	10
Digital forensics / incident response	8	9
Notification / call center / identity	6	6
Media liability counsel	6	6
Technology E&O counsel	6	6
Forensic accounting	5	5
Ransomware / cyber extortion	4	4
DDoS mitigation	4	4
Managed detection & response (MDR)	4	4
PR / crisis communications	3	3

Relationship types stay distinct, response, loss mitigation, and preparedness are separate categories and are never equated.

Providers (57)

Alston & Bird

Breach & Privacy Counsel

Arnold & Porter

Breach & Privacy Counsel

DLA Piper

Breach & Privacy Counsel · on 2 carrier panels in this dataset

Holland & Knight

Breach & Privacy Counsel · on 3 carrier panels in this dataset

Norton Rose Fulbright

Breach & Privacy Counsel · on 6 carrier panels in this dataset

Shook Hardy

Breach & Privacy Counsel · on 3 carrier panels in this dataset

Coalition Incident Response (CIR)

DFIR

Arete

DFIR · on 6 carrier panels in this dataset

Booz Allen

DFIR · on 6 carrier panels in this dataset

CrowdStrike

DFIR · on 6 carrier panels in this dataset

Mandiant

DFIR · on 5 carrier panels in this dataset

Cypfer

Cyber Extortion Services · on 4 carrier panels in this dataset

CyberSteward

Cyber Extortion Services

ProGlobix

Cyber Extortion Services

Quorum Cyber

Cyber Extortion Services · on 2 carrier panels in this dataset

Epiq

Notification · on 6 carrier panels in this dataset

Equifax

Notification

Experian

Notification · on 5 carrier panels in this dataset

IDX

Notification · on 3 carrier panels in this dataset

Kroll

Notification · on 5 carrier panels in this dataset

TransUnion / Sontiq

Notification · on 5 carrier panels in this dataset

FleishmanHillard

PR & Crisis Management · on 3 carrier panels in this dataset

Matson Driscoll Damico (MDD)

Forensic Accounting · on 2 carrier panels in this dataset

Meaden & Moore

Forensic Accounting

JS Held

Forensic Accounting

DLA Piper

Media Liability · on 2 carrier panels in this dataset

Holland & Knight

Media Liability · on 3 carrier panels in this dataset

Norton Rose Fulbright

Media Liability · on 6 carrier panels in this dataset

DLA Piper

Technology E&O · on 2 carrier panels in this dataset

Holland & Knight

Technology E&O · on 3 carrier panels in this dataset

Norton Rose Fulbright

Technology E&O · on 6 carrier panels in this dataset

KLA Legal

Breach & Privacy Counsel · on 2 carrier panels in this dataset

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP

Breach & Privacy Counsel · on 2 carrier panels in this dataset

McDonald Hopkins

Breach & Privacy Counsel

Mullen Coughlin

Breach & Privacy Counsel · on 5 carrier panels in this dataset

Charles River Associates

DFIR · on 5 carrier panels in this dataset

Irongate Security

DFIR · on 3 carrier panels in this dataset

Level Blue

DFIR · on 2 carrier panels in this dataset

APCO Worldwide

PR & Crisis Management

Infinite Global

PR & Crisis Management

Akamai

DDoS Mitigation

Cloudflare

DDoS Mitigation

Google Project Shield

DDoS Mitigation

AWS Shield

DDoS Mitigation

Coalition Incident Response (CIR)

Deepfake Forensics

Wirespeed

Trusted MDR

CrowdStrike Falcon Complete

Trusted MDR

SentinelOne Vigilance Respond Pro

Trusted MDR

SentinelOne Vigilance Respond

Trusted MDR

Baker Tilly

Forensic Accounting

YA Group

Forensic Accounting

Ballard Spahr

Media Liability

Clark Hill

Media Liability

McDonald Hopkins

Media Liability

McDonald Hopkins

Technology E&O

Gordon Rees

Technology E&O

Wilson Elser

Technology E&O

Sources

Enterprise Panel Providers (accessed 2026-10-06)

U.S. enterprise panel; page states last updated July 2026

The gaps are the product

Verification, SLA, capacity, credential, and contractual evidence are exactly what the VendorQuals carrier platform produces, the evidence-backed panel adequacy report your regulator will ask for.

Carrier membership →